Monday, November 5, 2007

Trial by Fire

Trial by Fire
By Vikas Vij
When Sita chose Ram in the Swayamvar, she had no idea where her fate was headed.She insisted on accompanying Ram to the forest in exile so that she could be with her husband at all times. A girl who was born and brought up in immense luxuries, agreed to share her husband's misfortunes boldly in the jungles.Sita's miseries of life did not end with her difficult years as a nomad in the wilderness. Infact, they had only begun.While in the forest, Sita's erratic and arrogant brother-in-law slashed the ears and nose of a woman who wished to marry him. It was a barbaric act that only a man of Laxman's calibre could inflict upon a woman. And Laxman's brother, Maryada Purushottam Ram, kept silent at this criminal act and neither apologized to the victim or her family, nor did anything to redress the wrong or protect the victim.As a consequence of this savage act, Ravan kidnapped Sita and kept her in confinement, even though her only fault was that she was Ram's wife. An innocent and trusting woman kidnapped treacherously from her humble dwellings. Is there anything worse that can happen to a woman's self-esteem?Yes sir, there is. As later events would reveal, being kidnapped and imprisoned by Ravan was the least of Sita's humiliations. Ram waged a war against Lanka to avenge his own princely honor. While Sita imagined all this while that Ram was fighting for her sake. Upon her rescue by Ram, Sita wept, having been away from her beloved for so long and now excited at the prospect of a reunion.Ram, however, remained cold, aloof and distant from her. And then he went on to speak his mind: "Today I have avenged the insult to my honor. While you, Sita, stand without shame before me, even though suspicions have arisen with regard to your character. Today you appear as unacceptable to me as light to the one who is suffering from eyesores. Therefore, go wherever you wish, O Janak's daughter, all ten directions are open to you today. "What man born of nobility would accept a woman who has lived with another man, simply because she has been favorable to him in the past? How can I accept you, who was enveloped in the arms of Ravan while being taken away by him, and who was lusting for you? I do not have any interest in you anymore. Therefore, you may go wherever you want."In a complete state of shock, and with tears filled in her eyes, Sita addressed her obedient brother-in-law Laxman: "Raise for me a funeral pyre, O Laxman. I no longer wish to live as I'm accused falsely of crimes that I did not commit."Laxman looked at this brother, half-expecting him to put an end to this shameful public drama. But to his horror, Ram did not bat an eyelid, and did not stop this barbaric tragedy from going any further.The usually short-tempered Laxman, who was intolerant to injustice, and who had advised his brother Ram to launch an armed rebellion against their father's decision to send him to exile, surprisingly acted like a meek slave in the face of this criminal outrage against Sita.Not one of the assembled warriors, who had displayed exceptional valour on the battlefield just now, had the courage to open their mouth against this autocratic behavior of Ram, and to oppose the historic injustice against a woman that was about to be perpetrated.Laxman proceeded to prepare the fire.As a mark of respect, Sita walked in a circle around Ram, who, as the ancient texts describe it -- "stood with his head hung down."The entire cosmos came to a halt in horror as Sita approached the fire. Sita entered the raging flames. But lo and behold! Sita's blazing faithfulness singed the fire itself, and Agnidev cried out in pain. Sita had proved too pure for the fire to burn her out.Ram was suddenly beside himself with joy at this public display of his wife's purity of character. "The world would have whispered against me, and accused me of being a lustful man who accepted Sita without testing her chastity." Sita let Ram have his way, and followed him to Ayodhya without any protest.But Sita's cup of tragedy was not yet full. It still had room for more. Rumors started floating in Ayodhya about the wisdom of having a queen who had spent a long time in a kidnapper's captivity. Ram, surprisingly for a king, did not display any strength of conviction or a backbone of his own. A king must follow what is just and logical (nyaya-poorna and tark-sangat), and not what the mass opinion says. If ten thousand people say a wrong thing, it is still a wrong thing, and if only one person says the right thing, it is still the right thing.Even though Sita was in an advanced stage of pregnancy, Ram did not think twice and immediately decided to abandon Sita to the forests. Just like when your pet dog becomes a nuisance, you would abandon it in such a distant place from where it cannot return.The very next morning, Laxman took Sita to the forest in his chariot, lying to her that they were visiting a sage. On reaching the forest, Laxman said: "The king has abandoned you because he is afraid of the muffled protests taking place in his kingdom against him. I'm going to leave you near this hermitage now, and you will have to walk further on your own.Sita gave birth to twin sons in the forest, and brought them up as a single mother. When the sons reached their teens, the tales of their valour spread far and wide. When the glory of his sons came to Ram's notice, he wanted them back in his kingdom. He recalled Sita alongwith her sons from the jungle, and without even a hint of any regret or hesitation, quickly asked Sita to "perform" her Agni-Pareeksha once again, and enthrall the audiences of his kingdom with the same spectacle that she had earlier performed for him in Lanka.But this time round Sita reacted differently. She did not feel shocked or surprised at Ram's request. She did not have tears in her eyes. She did not ask Laxman to prepare a pyre for her. She did not walk around her husband in a circle of deference. She simply folded her hands, closed her eyes, and requested Mother Earth to take her in her bosom.Guru Vashishtha mili lagan sudhai, ek surya-mantra deenhaJo Sita Raghunath bihai, ik pal chein nahin keenha[A wisest sage like Vashishitha chose the most auspicious time for the marriage of Ram and Sita, and gave them the coveted Surya-mantra for the protection of their marriage. But defying all astrological predictions, "Jo Sita Raghunath bihai, ik pal chein nahin keenha..."]
Venu Gopal said...
10:23 PM 5/Nov/07

When Rama was about to be anointed as the successor to the King, his father was forced to have a change of heart. But such was the integrity of Rama that even the one chosen to the throne in his place refused to sit on it but placed there Rama’s shoes as a token of Rama''s sovereignty. When asked to go to the forest in exile, he did not forcefully take his wife along but his wife dutifully volunteered to go along, again proving Rama''s integrity.

Surpanekha might have fallen in love with Rama but for Rama the question of marrying her did not arise. He, amused by her approach and prescient about the events about to unfold, asked her to seek Lakshmana's hand. But when Lakshmana refused her she became violent, transformed herself into the witch she actually was before she had changed her form into a beautiful woman to entice Rama, and started attacking Sita. It was only at this point and circumstance that Lakshmana too turned violent. We must remember Lakshmana was absolutely devoted to Sita and his respect for her was such that he did not ever cast a look at her face but always looked at her feet while addressing her. He was therefore naturally outraged to see Sita being attacked thus and lost his sense of proportion. This episode indicates not Lakshmana’s lack of chivalry in attacking a woman, but his overwhelming determination to ensure that not the slightest hurt happens to Sita.

If Rama was the type to doubt Sita’s chastity, he would have given up on her after she was kidnapped, married another woman and settled down. But he undertook a long and eventful rescue mission. Then again, as Agnipariksha would have revealed whether Sita was chaste, Rama would not have asked her to go through the rite if he is was not certain of her chastity, as otherwise she would have been burnt to ashes and Rama’s image, which his modern day critiques say he wanted so much to protect, would have taken a beating.

When Rama and Sita went back to Ayodhya, a washerwoman’s comment about the upright King Rama reflected his subjects’ unspoken doubt about Sita’s chastity. If through many thousands of years after the characters of the epics Ramayana and Mahabharatha lived, the names of Sita, Sati, Savtri and many others continue to present to humanity everything that is most noble in the character of womanhood, it is, in Sita’s story, because Rama, being an Avataar who had descended from Godhood and come to reinstate Dharma on earth, exhibited to the world at large the absolute divine qualities of his consort for all times. The medium he chose to do so was the concept of chastity and the ritual of agnipareeksha.

Rama had not ‘abandoned’ her for the wild animals in the jungle, as some modern day writers seem to make out, but sent to live for a period in the Ashram of none other than Valkmiki, who was later on to write the Ramayana. If Sita had not understood who Rama was and the implications of his actions and if she had thought ill of Rama, Valkimi would have been the first to know and he would have hardly endeavoured to create the Ramayana in glory of Rama. This itself is proof that all actions of Rama was a premeditated trajectory to fulfil the goals of his avataarhood.

The events of Ramayana are certainly larger than life and timeless demonstrations of love, fidelity, honour and righteousness to stand the test of time. It has stood the test of time - for even today Rama is Purushottam (the perfect gentleman) and Sita is the perfect womanhood of devoted wife and dedicated motherhood for millions of Hindus. It was a fitting finale to the story that Sita returns to the bosom of earth, from where she had come as the child of mother earth. And Rama gave up his life in the Sarayu, on the banks of which he was born.

Psychology of a Slave

originalthinkers.rediffiland.com/
Monday 5 November, 2007

By Vikas Vij 10:18 5/Nov/2007 7 Comment(s)
Add Vikas Vij as Friend Write to Vikas Vij Forward this link
Pain, physical or mental, can have such a damaging and permanent influence that it can paralyse the mind forever. In a jail, if you torture an innocent victim too hard, he will almost start believing that he is the murderer, even if he had actually nothing to do with the crime altogether.Fear of pain and fear of being killed are the chief weapons of a dictator which he uses effectively. You can single-handedly force an entire nation to crawl on all fours before you, if you can terrify them enough.Fear blurs logic completely. You can start fearing your own shadow if you are walking alone in the dark in an abandoned alley in the middle of the night. Even if the shadow can do no harm, and it is powerless like a paper tiger, yet you cannot get rid of the fear as you imagine it to be someone much more powerful than it actually is. The fear of being attacked or killed by something or someone is so overwhelming in such a situation that it paralyses logic.Gandhi was one man who dared to face fear logically, and realised the hollowness of its claims. The moment he decided that death or a jail term was "okay" for him, he had no fear of these any longer. Once you have accepted the worst, you are not afraid anymore.Gandhi destroyed the colonialists' only weapon -- fear. There was a powerful scene in Richard Attenborough's well-researched film "Gandhi", where Gandhi tells his followers that each one of them will keep breaking the police cordon, and keep getting hit by their wooden batons on the head -- without any retaliation in return. At each hit, the man would fall down, and the next man would come forward to face the next hit. One after another after another. That one single piece of cinema must be one of the clearest and most visual demonstrations ever of how to finish the game of fear.The job of the police baton is not to hit you, but to scare you. If you refuse to get scared, you have punctured the dictator's plan. Why? Because the numbers are already hugely against him. He is one. You are innumberable. He cannot win this unequal battle by force. He can only win it by paralysing you psychologically. There is an old Chinese saying that a panther would attack you much more ferociously than it does, if it knew that you are afraid of it. In 1989, the Chinese students took to the streets in a massive uprising against communism, and took seize of the Tiananmen Square in Beijing. The government quickly understood that it was a battle of fear versus fearlessness, and that the hollowness of fear would be soon exposed, unless fearlessness was nipped in the bud. The government swiftly ordered its military to open fire on unarmed students, and as per the New York Times count, about 800 civilians were killed, while the Red Cross estimated the number of dead to be around 3000. (3 times the Jallianwala Bagh massacre).Like China, even Pakistan is a slave nation till today. The great Punjabi poet of Lahore, Ustaad Daaman, had summed up the fate of Pakistan quite succintly in two short lines as follows: Pakistan de dou KhudaLa ila, tey Marshal Law But now Pakistan, after nearly sixty years of perfect slavery (with a few brief interruptions), is finally waking up from its paralysis of fear, and raising its voice against the shame of dictatorship. Men like Justice Choudhary, Imran Khan, Benazir Bhutto or the fearless owners of Geo TV etc. are finally getting to a point where fear is no longer an option. They must maintain their courage in their trial by fire. They are not alone, because the Pakistani masses are with them. Though the Indian Ministry of External Affairs has merely "regretted" the emergency in Pakistan, but our message to our Pakistani friends should be slightly more straightforward: If you can have the courage to expose fear, you will see that the emperor has actually no clothes. Dictatorship is a guaranteed hoax. It is a toy bomb hijacking an entire airplane. Have guts to call their bluff and you will see limitless cowardice beneath their upper false layer of cruelty. If you decide to stand up to their terrorism, the cowards will run for their life, and seek amnesty for their crimes from you only.But of course, it is easier said than done. To overcome fear, sometimes even centuries are not enough. Fearless men are not born everyday.
The national poet of Pakistan, Iqbal knew what he was talking when he spoke these lofty words in praise of Gandhi:
Hazaaro'n saal nargis apni bey'noori pey roti hai
Badi mushqil sey hota hai, chaman mein deedaawar paida
nargis = earth
bey'noori = absence of charm
deedaawar = the one who is worth watching


Venu Gopal said...
7:47 PM 5/Nov/07

Very well written piece of wisdom. This short essay actually must be put in the school-book of every secondary school student in India. Congratulations.

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Bobby Jindal

By Vikas Vij 07:33 28/Oct/2007 2 Comment(s)
Add Vikas Vij as Friend Write to Vikas Vij Forward this link
Bobby Jindal continued...
When Arnold Schwartznegger won his elections in California, the Austrians celebrated back home.
Similarly, Sonia Gandhi's victory caused jubilation in Italy, and became a hot topic of discussion in Italy's political circles, and the leading Italian newspapers frontpaged the news in headlines. And perhaps the most generous compliment of all, came from a magazine owned by the then Prime Minister of Italy (media magnate Bertolusconi) that said: "Now we are going to have two Italian Prime Ministers, but theirs is better than ours." It is the destiny of the narrow-minded to view everything through the colored glasses of race, religion and nationality. Whereas, if you view it through the prism of humanity, the victories of Arnold Schwartznegger, Bobby Jindal and Sonia Gandhi are the victories of humanity over parochialism and narrow-mindedness. These victories are the little joys of life that are shared and celebrated by those who understand their meaning. As humble immigrants, Arnie and Bobby came to America with hope and with stars in their eyes. They rose to the very top amid stiff hurdles and extreme competition. But the most delicious victory of all, perhaps, was the victory of Sonia Gandhi in India when she demolished the highly seasoned "ghaags" (I don't have an English equivalent for this term) of Indian politics -- in one swift stroke with her humility and straightforwardness. They heaped personal insults on her, such as repeatedly referring to her by her maiden name "Sonia Maino", and making fun of her Catholic religion, and even mocking her culture, accent, food habits and so on. It was the most vicious personal campaign ever orchestrated that single-mindedly attacked an individual's personal life. And yet that simple woman of Italian origin won against all odds and all opinion polls, and provided a fresh lease of life to the dead and buried Congress party of India. Let us understand a fundamental truth about humanity: Left to themselves, human beings do not discriminate. It is not in their nature. Hindus and Muslims lived like brothers before the partition riots -- their diverse cultures and diverse religious beliefs notwithstanding. Hindus and Sikhs lived the same way in Punjab before terrorism of the 80's. Politics, i.e., divide and rule, is man's second nature. Therefore, discrimination among humans becomes a critical divisive tool of politics. For the politician, it is easy to fool the emotional masses by using this tool effectively. But in an increasingly globalised world, this tool of race, nationality and religion is beginning to lose its discriminatory value. The dividing lines are blurring, even though very slowly. Jindal's or Sonia's victories are only a reaffirmation of this fact. Merit comes before anything else in today's competitive times. The choice of the candidate must be professional, and not emotional.
Let us not forget that the Indian ancient thought was based on the principle of "Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam" (the whole world is one family.)
Ayam nijah parovetthi gananam laghu-chetasaamUdaar charitanam tu vasudhaiva kutumbakam"
[Maha Upanishad, Verse 71]
This is mine, that is yours, is man's petty way of seeing the reality; For those with noble consciousness, the whole world is a family.
Warning: But don't tell all this to emotional fools who are experts in fake patriotism. Even when the times are changing, you will never be able to change their thinking. An old Mewari saying: Akal deveyo'n naahi aaveyEey tou heeyo'n hi upajeySensibility cannot be givenIt sprouts from within

Venu Gopal said...
10:41 AM 28/Oct/07

Dear Vij, When you say, “But don't tell all this to emotional fools who are experts in fake patriotism. Even when the times are changing, you will never be able to change their thinking”, there seems to be a glossing over (explaining away) of others’ points of view. Are those who are emotional, fools? Fake patriotism? Who do you have in mind? I would say that those who sided China in the 1962 war and today oppose the Indo-US nuclear deal and those who consider Mecca as holy land but are unable to sing Vande Mataram but are willing to lap up all benefits they get as minorities are fake patriots. You say that changing times require change in thinking and yet you quote from the Upanishads, thereby asserting that some thoughts don’t dim with time.

Sonia Gandhi’s main agenda is strengthening Christianity in India. However when Jindal went to America he renounced Hinduism and converted to Christianity. One could say that in both instances each have only exercised their right to live and believe as they prefer. However, Vaasudeva Kutumbakam would work only if we accept that others’ way of living are also legitimate. An educated person like Jindal who abandoned Hinduism and accepted Christianity would only be working for Christ’s Kingdom (meaning the Church) and not for Vasudeva Kudumbakam. About Arnie, he has fans across the world including me but as of today he would not be able to become President of America. The Americans are only now talking of changing their constitution to allow a foreign-born to become President but till they actually do so (when they think it is priority) let us not be unfair on Indians who state the fact that Sonia is an Italian and we do not want an Italian Prime Minister of India.

INDER VIG said...
4:11 PM 29/Oct/07
This is mine, that is yours, is man''s petty way of seeing the reality; For those with noble consciousness, the whole world is a family.AND THATS THE ONLY TRUTH,,,,,,,WHAT A MEANING FULL POST IS YOURS,,,WISH ALL TO UNDERSTAND THE SPIRITS
Venu Gopal said...
10:03 AM 30/Oct/07

What Inder Vig says is absolutely true - mine-yours divide is a petty way of seeing reality. But the state of non-duality is achieved by man only after intense spiritual practices - till then our understanding would not be translated to reality. That we should be exited about an Indian becoming Governor of a state in America proves that the mine-yours divide is alive in us. Criticizing him for having converted also proves the existence of the same divide in us - our sense of righteousness and falsity. Whose sense of righteousness is true? Then again, the greatest of Advaita masters do come down to the level of ordinary people to raise them to a higher level. So even such Advaita masters need necessarily take a "my-way-right, your-way-wrong" stand point.
Therefore in the ultimate analysis, duality is inevitable. When we achieve non-duality, we achieve moksha - no more return to the pettiness of the world. Advaita is the absolute truth, the glory of Hinduism, the teaching that disproves the claim of the Semitic religions to be the ultimate messengers of truth. However, Advaita is for the individual. So long as we need to have a society, the mine-yours dichotomy would remain.
I further wish to add to what I''ve said above.
The teaching of Advaita has had pervasive effect on Hindu culture, the most obvious being the inclusive nature of Hinduism - crystallized in the mantra "Vasudeva Kutumbakam". Today, when the world is slowly and surely moving towards a clash of civilizations - between the Christian and Islamic worlds, Advaita can bring in the cooling effect - would even expose the limited dogmas of both these Semitic religions. Therefore if we are to contribute to universal well being both as individuals and as a society, the yogic vision of Advaita is inevitable, which alone would lead to a harmonious or Dharmic society.



Friday, October 5, 2007

Three Tough Questions?

funnybirdy.rediffiland.com/
Saturday 6 October, 2007
Category : Religion

11:54 27/Sep/2007 1 Comment(s)

Assalam o alaikum
Three Tough Questions?
There was a young man who went overseas to study for quite a long time. When he returned, he asked his parents to find him a religious scholaror any expert who could answer his 3 Questions. Finally, his parents were able to find a Muslim scholar.Young man: Who are you? Can you answer my questions? Scholar: I am one of Allah (SubHana Wa Ta`ala )'s slaves and Insha-Allah(God willing), I will be able to answer your questions. Young man: Are you sure? A lot of Professors and experts were not able toanswer my questions.Scholar: I will try my best, with the help of Allah(SubHana Wa Ta`ala).Young Man: I have 3 questions: 1. Does God exist? If so, show me His shape.2. What is thaqdir (fate)? 3. If shaitan (Devil) was created from the fire, why at the end he willbe thrown to hell that is also created from fire. It certainly will not hurt him at all, since Shaitan (Devil) and the hell were created from fire. Did God not think of it this far?Suddenly, the Scholar slapped the young man's face very hard.Young Man (feeling pain): Why do you get angry at me? Scholar: I am not angry. The slap is my answer to your three questions. Young Man: I really don't understand.Scholar: How do you feel after I slapped you?Young Man: Of course, I felt the pain. Scholar: So do you believe that pain exists?Young Man: Yes. Scholar: Show me the shape of the pain!Young Man: I cannot.Scholar: That is my first answer. All of us feel God's existence without being able to see His shape... Last night, did you dream that you will be slapped by me?Young Man: No.Scholar: Did you ever think that you will get a slap from me,today?Young Man: No. Scholar: That is takdir (fate) my second answer........ My handthat I used to slap you, what is it created from? Young Man: It is created from flesh. Scholar: How about your face, what is it created from? Young Man: Flesh. Scholar: How do you feel after I slapped you? Young Man: In pain. Scholar: Thats it. this is my third answer, Even though Shaitan Devil) and also the hell were created from the fire, if Allah wants, insha-Allah (God willing), the hell will become a very painful place for Allah said: If you are ashamed of me, I will be ashamed of you." If you are not ashamed, pass this message on...only if you believe. Yes, I love Allah. Allah is my fountain of Life and My Savior. Allah keeps me going day & night. Without Allah, I am no one. But with Allah, I can do everything. Allah is my strength." May Allah help u to succeed... Ameen. Take Care, Allah Hafiz.
What the scholar ostensibly tries to say is that there are answers to all questions. However, this would be true only if we draw correct inferences from direct knowledge/experience. For the inference to be correct, our direct knowledge/experience of a thing must be interchangeable with the as yet unknown thing. If we discover water, air etc. in a planet, we can infer that there are living beings in that planet because such conditions on earth have given rise to living beings. This inference could be correct if the water and air in that planet is interchangeable with earth's water and air. The scholar says just as pain has no shape, God too could be without shape. However, the inference may be misplaced because God and pain are not interchangeable. Therefore it might be a case of the scholar trying to bamboozle an impressionable young man.

Source of our problems

funnybirdy.rediffiland.com/
Saturday 6 October, 2007

18:08 20/Sep/2007 0 Comment(s)
Add ok as Friend Write to ok Forward this link
A group of working adults got together to visit their University lecturer. The lecturer was happy to see them. Conversation soon turned into complaints about stress in work and life.
The Lecturer just smiled and went to the kitchen to get an assortment of cups - some porcelain, some in plastic, some in glass, some plain looking and some looked rather expensive and exquisite.
The Lecturer offered his former students the cups to get drinks for themselves.
When all the students had a cup in hand with water, the Lecturer spoke: "If you noticed, all the nice looking, expensive cups were taken up, leaving behind the plain and cheap ones. While it is normal that you only want the best for yourselves, that is the source of your problems and stress. What all you wanted was water, not the cup, but we unconsciously went for the better cups."
"Just like in life, if Life is Water, then the jobs, money and position in society are the cups. They are just tools to hold/maintain Life, but the quality of Life doesn't change."
"If we only concentrate on the cup, we won't have time to enjoy, taste and appreciate the water in it."
Permalink
This is an exquisite insight. Congratulations for this piece. Seeking fulfillment in the transient external is never satisfactory. A sense of lack always remains. It is when we turn within, to the spiritual path, that we can overcome our sense of lack and the resultant restlessness.

I Asked God

intimate.rediffiland.com/
Saturday 6 October, 2007

08:38 26/Sep/2007 3 Comment(s)
Add ramesh m as Friend Write to ramesh m Forward this link
I Asked God...

I asked God to take away my pain.
God said, No.'It is not for me to take away, but for you to give it up.'
I asked God to make my handicapped child whole.
God said, No.'Her spirit was whole, her body was only temporary.'
I asked God to grant me patience.
God said, No. 'Patience is a byproduct of tribulations; it isn't granted, it is earned.'
I asked God to give me happiness.
God said, No.'I give you blessings. Happiness is up to you.'
I asked God to spare me pain.
God said, No.'Suffering draws you apart from worldly cares and brings you closer to me.'
I asked God to make my spirit grow.
God said, No.'You must grow on your own, but I will prune you to make you fruitful.'
I asked God for all things that I might enjoy life.
God said, No.'I will give you life so that you may enjoy all things.'
I asked God to help me love others, as much as he loves me.
God said...'Ahhhh, finally you have the idea.'
Permalink
Venu Gopal said...
10:54 AM 6/Oct/07

A meaningful poem. We start life as a helpless baby totally dependent on external help. We need the external help, we get to like it, enjoy it, love it and finally we get bound to the external help and pleasure we derive. But somewhere along the line we are likely to feel something is lacking. At that point of time, depending on how we are influenced, we see the solution either in even more of external (material) conquests or the rejection of a material solution. If we so tend to reject the material solution, we would have begun on a quest within. This is the spiritual quest and it ends in not just discovering God but that we are in essence that divine power, having never had a reason for any sense of lack except for our ignorance.

Monday, September 3, 2007

Who was the founder of Islam


Who was the founder of islam?
Asked by : anip mehta 132 day(s) ago
Category : Education
View related Qs
Alert me
Report abuse
Email this

Answer this Question
Earn 10 points for answering this question.
Answer(s) 17
1.
premdeepak peedikayil
prophet Mohammed
(1)User votes

(2)Comments

Report Abuse

( 0)Email this


Add a comment
2.
Ahmed Kabeer
Islam wasn't founded by any person. it isn't like other religions where some human being came and founded a religion and he became God. According to Islam, it is the religion sent down to mankind by God. Let me tell you one thing clearly : Muhammed is NOT the founder of Islam. Nor is Ibrahim or any other prohet. The prophets are just messengers who came to propogate the message of Islam. They were given guidace by God Almighty to spread the message of Islam.
(1)User votes

(1)Comments

Report Abuse

( 0)Email this


Comments to this answer (1)
1.
Venu Gopal Why have the messengers stopped with Mohammad?

Add a comment
Your comment on this answer is submitted.

254 characters remaining
Why have the messengers stopped with Mohammad?

3.
L KINI
MOHMMED PAIGAMBAR
(1)User votes

(1)Comments

Report Abuse

( 0)Email this


Add a comment
4.
radhika
The word islam comes 4m d root salam means peace n submitting ur will 2 GOD this religion is on d earth since d beginning n prophet Mohammad was not the founder of this religion but was one of the messangers of God who completed the message spreaded by other prophets before him like prophet Ibrahim, Musa, Isa, Nuh (? peace be on them)
(0)User votes

(1)Comments

Report Abuse

( 0)Email this


Comments to this answer (1)
1.
Venu Gopal If Islam means peace and submitting our will to God, then why is there so much violence in the name of Islam and are the Sunnis and Shias submitting to the will of Allah in being enemies of each other?

Add a comment
Your comment on this answer is submitted

Friday, August 24, 2007

HAPPY ONAM AT TN RAILWAY STATIONS


hindutva.rediffiland.com/
Saturday 25 August, 2007

09:58 25/Aug/2007 0 Comment(s)
Add hindu icon as Friend Write to hindu icon Forward this link


ON ONAM eve we get snubbed by Tamil Nadu by its regional satraps, we as Malayalees need to evaluate the causes of total lack of respect for the state in the national political scene.Wat astonishes me more is the fact that this is in the backdrop of the great respect that Malayaless get as individuals across any spectrum. I can personaly vouch for it for I hav spent a large part of my life in Mumbai.Why then do we not get even an ounce of that same respect collectively as a state tat we get personally for belonging to this state.With my limited knoweldge hav put down some pointsKerala lacks a strong regional party for we lack a self respect.Self respect is a by product of confidence. How can a state that survives on inward receipts of NRK's hav any.How can a state whose brightest brains r all outside hav any confidence.
It is said that " A Malayalee is the best worker , but outside Kerala"Unless we get rid of this prejudice and start devloping OUR KERALA as the
"INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL "
of INDIA, we will be snubbed time and again.MAY MAVELI THIS TIME COME WITH SOME COMMON SENSE TO OUR BELOVED POLITICIANS
who call for agitations for all that happens in Palestine but hav noting to say wen Railway Recruitment Board goes abt the process of selection without proper coverage in the regional Newspaper, resulting in appointment of less than 10% of localites.

Venu Gopal said...
11:16 AM 25/Aug/07

It should be an eye-opener that some political parties in Kerala are today (Saturday, just two days away from Thiruonam) enforcing a railway bandh and have put out of gear all trains carrying train-full of Malayalees to Kerala to celebrate Onam. Why could they not have done it after Onam? Would they call for such bandhs on the eve of Id or Christmas? Probably serves the Malayalee right – he has always been enthusiastic in voting anti-Hindu forces to power!

Monday, August 13, 2007

AKHAND BHARAT SMARAN DIN

hindutva.rediffiland.com/
Tuesday 14 August, 2007

08:27 14/Aug/2007 0 Comment(s)
Add hindu icon as Friend Write to hindu icon Forward this link
The sight of the map of Mother India sends shivers down my spine, for ilook at her current map, i see her without her arms and i blame us herchildren for bringing such shame on her.on this fateful daylet us all take a solemn pledge that we will keep telling ourselvesthat we will celebrate our next Independence day in Lahore till it isachieved.It took 2000 years for the Jewish community but they didnt loose heart.I hereby assure you that if we HINDUS put our heart to it it will take us less than a century to achieve it.SAMARTH BHARAT AKHAND BHARAT

Venu Gopal said...
9:28 AM 14/Aug/07

Remembering Akhand Bharat and pledging to revert to our status as an unified nation is a noble cause for which we should be prepared to strive till success. Congratulations for your post on the eve of Akhand Bharat Smaran Din.

Wednesday, August 1, 2007

This Blog ends here



By Sandil Srinivasan 13:12 30/Jul/2007 0 Comment(s)
Add Sandil Srinivasan as Friend Write to Sandil Srinivasan Forward this link
It's been nice blogging here folks, and it's time to bid adieu. I loved the exposure here at rediff iLAND but it's time to shut down this blog for good -- I will be blogging more often at Mutiny.inand hope to see you there sometime.
... and I am retaining Showbizia :-)
The prime reason to have suspended blogging is because I want to focus on completing my book. In the interim, I have setup a personal blog for myself where I play around with fiction, and photoblogging -- 2S
ciao,
Sandy

Venu Gopal said...
8:04 PM 1/Aug/07

Oh, Sandy, I was shocked that you''ve decided to end your blogging at Rediffmail. You are undoubtedly the best writer I''ve read in this blogsphere. I''ve not read all your blogs but I''ve saved it all to read when I have the time because I know that I will be sitting at a luxurious banquet table of literature when I get that holiday I''ve promised myself to attend your party of great reading. However, I''m happy you will continue to be in the world of writing with your planned book. Do announce it on Rediffmail when it is ready. Further, I''ll follow you to the other sites you have mentioned. I''d be a fool if I don''t because a good read is what I relish the most. Best wishes to you and thanks a ton for all the wonderful writings.

Saturday, July 28, 2007

Khud-guru

originalthinkers.rediffiland.com/
Saturday 28 July, 2007

By Vikas Vij 14:23 27/Jul/2007 15 Comment(s)
Add Vikas Vij as Friend Write to Vikas Vij Forward this link

Two thousand years ago Plato wrote that "Logos" is a (Greek) word that signifies the superiority of man over the feeble intelligence of lower animals. Logos stands for both, "Reason" and "Speech". It means both. Two different words, but same meaning. Why?Because "Thought" is not possible without "Words". Try to think without words, and you will know the importance of words. Words are, effectively, the only currency in which we can exchange thoughts even with ourselves. The mentally handicapped ones cannot talk coherently. While wondering about the richness of the word "Logos, I tried to think of a Sanskrit equivalent for it in Hindu philosophy. And lo and behold, the whole mystery unfolded itself before me in an instant, the moment I thought of the Hindi equivalent of "Speech". "Vani" (speech), as we know, is another name for Goddess Saraswati. ("Jaya jaya Vani Saraswati..."). This indicates that even in Hindu philosophy, "Speech" and "Saraswati" were considered identical. Brahma had created Saraswati and endowed her with the power of speech.Sometime back on the Discovery channel there was an interesting program that showed that Parrots are the second most intelligent species after human beings. The parrot comes closest to man in terms of repetition (rote). It cannot think on its own, it does not have a logical brain like humans, but at least it has a brain that can copy accurately, if it is trained properly like a baby. Even apes like to copy (ape) but they cannot process words, they can only copy gestures.
Mastering the Vedas cover to cover like a Veda Shastri, chanting complicated hymns in a rapidfire like a pandit or maulvi, and quoting fluently chapter and verse from the Gita, Quran and Bible makes you exactly that: A parrot.
Parroting another's words is a murder of one's self-respect. It is also a disrespect to the original. You are not showing respect to the Gita, Quran and Bible by parroting them in full throes of bhakti. You cannot copy an original, you can only ruin its soul. What is the value of a cheap imitation of Monalisa selling on a pavement?Speech based on someone else's thought, instead of your own, is parroting. The voice is of the caged parrot, but the thought is somebody else's.

Animals and machines are man's slaves because they are incapable of thinking for themselves.

Men too become slaves of men when they stop thinking.

Hold a coin in your fist and ask any religious guru or a spiritual thug to tell its denomination. He will not know even that much -- something just five feet from his eyes. But he knows everything about God in an infinite space, and he wants to "teach" you everything about Him.

These are the men who saw that sun rises in the east and sets in the west, so they declared the sun revolves around the earth. These are the men who saw the trees, but missed the forest.

These are the same men who made Socrates drink his cup of Hemlock when he stated matter-of-factly: "Sorry, I do not know who or what runs this Universe. All I know is that I do not know."

These are the same men who imprisoned Galileo 400 years ago just because he told them: "My divine-sightedness is at least more than yours."

And these are the same men who tell you that you are incapable of knowing God on your own. So you must choose the path of religion, i.e., a prescribed path -- which is the path of blind belief and bhakti.

Following another's prescribed path is a violation of your individuality of spirit, your eternal quest, and your self-esteem.

The Point:

Do not be a parrot. You are a human being. Only you can talk -- no other animal can.

As long as man behaves like a parrot, he will seethe in anger within. And violence will remain his ultimate destiny on this planet. Being a caged parrot is not man's first nature. Inquisitiveness is his first nature, just like a free bird soaring in an endless sky.

The path of bhakti eventually leads to violence.

Osama Bin Laden, for instance, is a truly religious man. So was Nathu Ram Godse. So is George W. Bush. These are sincere, religious men. Their path is the path of true devotion. If you are not devoted like them, you are even worse than them. You are neither here, nor there. You are a dishonest escapist. You are a nobody.

Bhakti is fearfulness -- an absolute corruption of the basic spirit of man. It is the self-defeating path of anger and violence.

Thinking, on the other hand, is the path of freedom and happiness.

Thinking is man's true destiny because he alone has the capability for it.

Guru, ladies and gentlemen, is for the unthinking masses -- the fearful nobodies who prefer to crawl than to think.

For the remaining few, the men of self-esteem, there is Khud-guru.

Venu Gopal said...
2:20 PM 28/Jul/07

Your post is a splendid putting into words of the idea that no one can live our lives for us; we have to do it for ourselves. But help we would need and it is our freedom to avail it as and when necessary. Fortunately, there are titans in the world of thought and expression and experience and spiritual attainments who leave us their best works to guide us by. Parrot-wise rote would land us exactly where you said. We have to internalize the teachings and live it anew. Hinduism, I might add, are teachings which lead us to God-realization or the realization of our deepest truth. The Semitic religions stop at just believing and hoping that the loyalty expressed thereby would ‘save’ us.

Citizen Cane said...
9:08 AM 28/Jul/07
Vikas, you say that ''thinking, on the other hand, is the path of freedom and happiness''. If that were true then all the thinking that humankind has indulged in, specially in the West, since the so-called Renaissance in Europe should have brought immense happiness by now. Instead, we have the World Wars in Europe, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the spectre of nuclear conflict, etc. as legacies from the 20th century and Global Warming and Iraq right at the beginning of the 21st. Literary figures such as Ernest Hemingway, Arthur Koestler and others have taken their own lives after, presumably, a whole lifetime of ''thinking''. Thinking, by itself, does not bring wisdom nor happiness.

Citizen Cane said...
8:56 AM 28/Jul/07
Vikas, I agree with Naina that it does seem to be a bit of a rant rather than a well-informed post. Bandying about recognisable names such as Socrates, Aristotle, Voltaire, Einstein, etc. might get you comments such as ''gr8 post'', etc. from the not-so-well-informed bloggers but a discerning reader will see through your ill-constructed arguments. Would attributing this or that to these historical figures not lead a person to presume that they have been adopted by you as ''gurus'', that your thinking is not entirely original. It is said that only BUDDHAS develop their mental faculties while they are bodhisattvas in countless previous lives to be able to figure out everything by themselves on the basis of direct experience, not merely by intellectual speculation, which is what the philosophers do. The rest have to refer to some teacher or the other or his teachings to figure things out . It depends on the seeker''s ability which teacher/teaching he lands up with - as says Tammanna.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Original Thinking


originalthinkers.rediffiland.com/
Wednesday 18 July, 2007

By Vikas Vij 15:40 18/Jul/2007 1 Comment(s)
Add Vikas Vij as Friend Write to Vikas Vij Forward this link
Last year I took my little son to Nehru Planetorium situated at the "Teen Murti" House in New Delhi. A portion of Nehru's last will is inscribed in stone at the Teen Murti lawns, which stated as follows: "I wish to declare with all earnestness that I do not want any religious ceremonies performed for me after my death. I do not believe in such ceremonies, and to submit to them, even as a matter of form, would be hypocrisy and an attempt to delude ourselves and others."

Jawaharlal Nehru, even though a Brahmin (a "Pandit") by caste, was privately against all kinds of religious mumbo-jumbo that goes on in our world.

Several years ago, Nehru's famous book "Discovery of India" was turned into a 52-episode landmark serial called "Bharat - Ek Khoj" by Shyam Benegal. The title song of that serial was a stunner:

Srishti se pehley sat nahin thha
Asat bhi nahin, antariksh bhi nahin
Aakaash bhi nahin thha
Chhipa thha kya, kahaan, kisne dhakaa thha
Uss pal tou agam, atal jal bhi nahin thha...

Srishti ka kaun hai kartaa
Kartaa hai ya woh akartaa
Oonchey aasmaan mein rehta
Sadaa adrishya banaa rehta
Wohi sach-much mein jaanta
Ya woh bhi nahin jaanta
Hai kisi ko nahin pataa
Nahin pataa, nahin pataa, nahin pataa...

This song resonated in millions of Indian living rooms every Sunday morning for a year.

Pay close attention to the last 4 lines of the song, and to the emphasis on the words "Nahin pata, nahin pata, nahin pata...." These words constitute the original central philosophy of the East (the Rig Veda) as well as the West (the Socratic philosophy).

This incredible song is actually a translation of the "Creation Hymn" of the Rig Veda, that has continued to captivate the imagination of scholars for centuries all over the world. The Creation Hymn wonders about who or what (or some other pronoun that we don't know of) created the Universe.

Rig Veda, the oldest known scripture to man, is probably the only ancient collection of verses in the world that does not talk about God and His glory. It is the only book that encourages thought and a pursuit of knowledge, and not fearful belief.

The thinkers who sat by the banks of Indus, and sang the Creation Hymn, must have thought hard to crack the mystery of the Universe. Finally, finding no answers, they simply put a question-mark on the origin of Creation. They simply concluded: "We don't know." Just as the entire edifice of Western philosophy got based on these words of Socrates: "All I know is the fact of my ignorance."

The Rig Vedic thinkers did not provide misleading, imaginary or hallucinatory answers. Instead of answering the question for the sake of answering (and thereby cheating and robbing mankind of its ability to think), they left the question unanswered for the next generations to pursue it further. So that thinking, and not bhakti, would become the destiny of man.

Two thousand years after the Rig Veda, the Greek thinker Aristotle, once again thought hard about this question for a lifetime, and in the end he said that till mankind exists, men will continue to ask this question, but will not find an answer to it.

Two thousand years after Aristotle, Albert Einstein spent another lifetime trying to unravel the mystery of the Universe, and said in the end: "I feel like a child playing with pebbles on the shores of a limitless ocean."

By giving an imaginary answer like "God" to this unanswered question of Creation, is to murder thinking. Once thinking has been successfully murdered, then Bhakti enters.

At the most, we can use God as a hypothesis to help us lead to better answers. But to believe the hypothesis itself as the conclusion, is the end of thinking and the beginning of blind bhakti.

God is but a hypothesis, a theory. Seek, search, prove, demonstrate, and then arrive at a conclusion. This process could take a million years of thought. Or, as Aristotle said out of frustration that till mankind lasts, it will never find the answer.

Worshipping a mere hypothesis is for the unthinking bhakt. If you see a two-year old child who has not been brainwashed yet, he will have no fear or bhakti or any other emotion towards God.

Prophet Mohammed said that one hour of thinking is worth more than 70 years of praying, and that the ink of a scholar is holier than the blood of a martyr.

Thinking is original. It creates something new from scratch, without building upon some pre-existing knowledge.

Your brain is your very own. Allow it to think originally. On the subjects that the world has no knowledge till now, you know as much or as little as anyone else. Your brain is as capable and qualified to think as anyone else.

Original thinking is but a function of your self-esteem.

On the question of your "Creation", think for yourself. Only you can discover yourself. By seeking a guru or a religion to find the answers, is like blind leading the blind. Doom is assured on that path.

Venu Gopal said...
7:06 PM 18/Jul/07

You have written a brilliant essay. Actually, the Vedic Hymn did not say "... maybe He knows, maybe He knows not ..." in the mode of ignorance. It simply said that when we awaken to the ultimate knowledge, the knower vanishes. Then who knows? This speculation is in the realm of Vedanta and words fail because words are limited. Only silence is.

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Hindu Name bearing Comrades,Prove your secular credentials!


Hindu Name bearing Comrades,Prove your secular credentials!
6/28/2007 3:40:23 AM HK
Thiruvananthapuram: If Sudhagaran is waging war against Hindus openly, M.A.Baby, the cultural Minister is waging it covertly.

The communist Ministers find immense pleasure in humiliating Hindus in the state. By announcing Raja Ravi Varma award to notorious painter M.F.Hussein initially and now by withdrawing the Sri Padmanabha Swami award, Baby gave a clear signal to Sudhagaran that he too is with him in competing to humiliate Hindus.

The decision to withdraw the award is taken because the award is in the name of a ‘Hindu God’!

Mahakavi Akkitham, who is also in advisory board of Kerala Sahithya Academy told that, No discussions were conducted and haven’t sought the opinion of other members before taking this decision. Cultural Organisation Tapsya vehemently criticised this attempt to humiliate the culture of Hindus in Kerala.

If the name of ‘Hindu Gods’ are a threat to secular nature of the state, then we urge Baby to rename his Party leaders bearing the Hindu God names. We request Achuthanandan(Lord Krishna), Kodiyeri Balakrishnan (Lord Krishna) and Pinarai Vijayan (Vijayan=Arjun) to prove their secular colour by shedding the present name as it violates the new ‘Secular Norms’ of their fellow Christian Comrade M.A.Baby.
K.Venugopal 6/28/2007 11:38:21 AM
There is another aspect to this. When Hindus converted to Christianity and Islam, they adopted Western and Arabic names respectively but when they 'converted' to Communism, they did not adopt Russian or Chinese names. What would have happened if they did? They and their subsequent generations would have gone completely outside the Hindu pale, as Christians and Muslims have gone. The same goes for atheist DMK too. Small mercy they retained their Hindu names and are Hindus at least by name! Many Christians, particularly in Maharashtra, retain Hindu names and have, maybe for this reason, not totally cut-off from the Hindu mainstream. Imagine if our Buddhist converts have Japanese names! So 'what is in a name?' is a pregnant question.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

The “Nothing-to-do Man” – a challenge to all activists.


18:17 8/Jun/2007
2 Comment(s)

The “Nothing-to-do Man” – a challenge to all activists.
I had a few days back posted a blog quoting the “Nothing-to-do Man”’s letter upon retirement. In these days when people feel more restless upon retirement than when they were gainfully employed, he is an odd-man-out. Aren’t we ever trying to do more and more so as to gain more, whether monetary-wise, fame-wise or popularity-wise? But here’s this guy, who is well educated, was in a senior well-paid position in a leading oil-company in the Middle East, well liked by whoever came across him, turning down equally good offers that came to him to continue aboard, moving away from it all for the quietude of a spiritual life, without, of course, absconding from any of his family commitments. How does one live without doing anything?

Since this gentleman is not onto activity of any kind, except talking kindly whenever the philosophy of life is discussed in his presence (and of course, being dutifully of help to his wife in running the household!), we will have to coax him into becoming a blogger. That, I think, would enrich the discourse on this blogsphere.

In an attempt to coax him, I call upon bloggers to write as to whether they feel that in order to be happy, we have to be doing one thing or the other. This, I think, would provide him the ‘ammunition’ to come abroad on this blogsphere and point out the alternative. I assure you, then, we shall hear a voice of a different kind.

Sandil Srinivasan said...
7:58 PM 27/Jun/07
He needs to undertake anything at all, that he feels is reasonably achievable. At that age, expectations from life, and from others are lower. Blogging is a great way to channel out specific thoughts in his own arena, as well as have people read what he talks about. A great forum, and he really ought to go for it.

Watch, and thou shalt live forever!


venu10.rediffiland.com/
Thursday 28 June, 2007

17:25 23/Jun/2007
2 Comment(s)

All of us are alive. And we experience. They say we can experience everything, even near death, but not death. Do we really die? All religions believe in an after-life. In fact, Hindus believe in life after life ad infinitum. They also say what spoils life is our fear of death. Not just physical death, but death or end of a situation or circumstance that we like. And therefore we try to hold on to what we like or love – and prevent what we dislike from happening. Maybe the antidote is to let-go. This we can only if we turn from being possessors (of what we like) to simply ‘watchers’. Let’s watch life and its impact on us and let it be. Maybe in the watching, fear would drop off. And we shall know that we are deathless.

Sandil Srinivasan said...
7:57 PM 27/Jun/07
Contrary to popular belief that Indians are generally spiritual, it''s a hard fact, but Indians -- generally -- are more materialistic than Spiritual. It would take a lot of reconditioning to shift focus from the micro to the macro.

Dear Sandil, It might be that more Indians are material rather than spiritual. But spirituality (as opposed to the religious) is such a rare thing in other countries that spirituality seems to be overwhelming in India. About your usage of the words micro and macro, spirituality is actually about the micro and not macro solution if by these words we mean individual and social respectively. That is to say, the solution to the human problem is at the individual level and not social level.

Swami Ayyappan

Dear Hindu Icon,
I was trying to get an historical information but was not successful, though I checked the Net. During which period did Swami Iyappa live? I ask this because it is said that Vavar was a Muslim. Did Iyappa live after Mohammad? Please elucidate.

FORGOTTEN HISTORY OF INDIAN FIGHTBACK AGAINST ISLAMIC RULE

Khusro Khan – A Hindu convert briefly overthrows the Khilji dynasty in 1320In the early 14th century (1312) Gujarat was overrun by the Muslim tyrants of who had a century earlier occupied Delhi. As was customary, the Muslims slaughtered countless Hindu victims after every victory. They also carried off many beautiful women and handsome young man as captives, to be used as sex slaves. One such handsome child was Khusro Khan. This was not his original name when he was carried off as a prisoner at the age of eleven. Even at that tender age, he had chiseled features and was fair complexioned. He belonged to the Makwana sub-caste of North Gujarat.As was the custom, all captives were forcibly converted to Islam and brought up as slaves. After nearly fifteen years in captivity Khusro Khan forgot what his original name was. He only faintly recollected that he had a different childhood which he shared with the other captives from Gujarat.His stunning features and fair complexion evoked the perverted lust of his captor Sultan Allaudin Khilji’s perverted son, Qutbuddin Mubarak Khalji. He like his more notorious father Alauddin Khalji, were in love with their young male slaves. Qutbuddin Mubarak had a particular fondness for his slave Khusro Khan and as a teenager, Khusro was sexually abused by Qutbuddin Mubarak for eight years.Khusro seethed for revenge against this barbarity that robbed him of his childhood and early youth.In 1320, Qutbuddin murdered his ageing father Allaudin and crowned himself emperor. By then Khushro had acquired a position of influence over Qutbuddin. Khusro had also used this influence to gather other captives like him and had arm them to make up Qutbuddin’s bodyguard. Khusro often wanted to put a sword through the Sultan and kill him while he was doing the immoral act of publicly kissing him. All through his teens, Khusro was forced to publicly offer his body to the Sultan like a prostitute. He did this apparent cheer, but within himself he was seething with rage and had been choking up with a desire for revenge at the way the Sultan forced himself upon him and took advantage of him.During the struggle for power in 1320 when Qutbuddin murdered his ageing father, Khusro got his chance. Qutbuddin had put his trust in his partner in perverted sex, Khusro and put him in charge of guarding his royal quarters. Qutbuddin Mubarak excluded all his father’s men from important duties in the palace and the army.Taking advantage of his position and the general resentment for Qutbuddin, Khusro murdered Qutbuddin Mubarak Khilji, and crowned himself king and assumed the title Khusro Khan. And what was a shock to the whole of India, especially to the Muslims occupying Delhi was that Khusro declared himself to be a Hindu again!! When he ascended the throne, Khusro Khan was only nineteen years of age. The Muslim nobility was shell-shocked, but with the strong contigent of Gujarati converts around Khusro Khan, they were momentarily stunned into inaction. However, they began plotting the overthrow of Khusro Khan – who in their eyes was a Murtad who had abjured Islam.Eventually, after a year, a Muslim General Ghazi Malik (who later took on the title Giyasuddin Tughlak) murdered Khusro and re-established the rule of Muslims in Delhi. After a brief interlude of Hindu rule, Ghazi Malik founded the Tughluq dynasty. But this event proved that if the Hindus had the determination grit and shrewdness, they could overturn Muslim rule in India. A dream that was to be realized later by the Marathas when they marched in to Delhi in 1720.
Venu Gopal said...
7:11 PM 27/Jun/07

Marvellous piece of history. By your reckoning, if the British had not come, would the Hindus have decimated the Muslims and re-established Hindu rule in India? Was it because the by then weakened Muslim rulers could not defeat the British (and the Hindus were not yet militarily prepared to take on the British) that the British ruled India?

Sush shouts back

Without retaliation, evils would one day become extinct from the world -- Anonymous.True, that. And evil lives up to expectations. Here's the BJP hitting back at the Sena for making their pick on the basis of regionalism. And Sushma Swaraj, a woman who tends to invite more respect than criticism, isn't exactly pleased.
"We are pained over the decision. It was not proper to take a decision concerning the next President of India based on regionalism"Which brings me to a topic of discussion -- on *what* basis is the decision made after all? Qualification? Reputation? Potential? Race? Culture? Religion? Skills? Authority? Arrogance? Humility? Diplomacy?What I need, as a citizen of this nation, is more transparency on the entire process. This is a figure who overlooks most national issues. This is a figure who has a reputation of being a rubber-stamp, but actually has potential to make a huge, huge difference. This is a figure that needs to match the arrogance of the West with the humility and love of the East, yet be firm. The toughest job in India, and heck, it better be the best choice.Oh -- and choices -- apparently Pratibha Patil isn't the best. Neither is Shekhawat. Kalam's ruled out. Oops -- we're a nation in doubt of who's the ideal choice. Mega oops. Somewhere down the line, I'd like to see Pavan K Verma in the seat.For now, a certain Gandhi must be giggling to herself -- two decades of bonding, shattered by a Presidential candidate? Brilliant!Whoever said the Italians couldn't play politics ...
Venu Gopal said...
6:50 PM 27/Jun/07

Sandil, You are a master writer. And the saying you''ve quoted, "Without retaliation, evils would one day become extinct from the world." is quite true. But since we are normally nothing but our ego, we need evil so we can go on evil-bashing trips. It soothes our ego. Long live evil!

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Rules from God for 2007

stacysin.rediffiland.com/
Tuesday 19 June, 2007

15:48 14/May/2007 7 Comment(s)
Add Stacy Sin as Friend Write to Stacy Sin Forward this link
Rules from God for 2007
1. Wake Up!! Decide to have a good day. "Today is the day the Lord hath made; let us rejoice and be glad in it" Psalms 118:24
2. Dress Up!! The best way to dress up is to put on a smile. A smile is an inexpensive way to improve your looks. "The Lord does not look at the things man looks at. Man looks at outward appearance; but the Lord looks at the heart." 1 Samuel 16:7
3. Shut Up!! Say nice things and learn to listen. God gave us two ears and one mouth, so He must have meant for us to do twice as much listening as talking. "He who guards his lips guards his soul." Proverbs 13:3
4. Stand Up!!...For what you believe in. Stand for something or you will fall for anything.. "Let us not be weary in doing good; for at the proper time, we will reap a harvest if we do not give up. Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good..." Galatians 6:9-10
5. Look Up!!... To the Lord. "I can do everything through Christ who strengthens me." Philippians 4:13
6. Reach Up!!... For something higher. "Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not unto your own understanding. In all your ways, acknowledge Him, And He will direct your path." Proverbs 3:5-6
7. Lift Up!!... Your Prayers. "Do not worry about anything; Instead PRAY ABOUT EVERYTHING." Philippians 4:6



Venu Gopal said...
7:53 PM 19/Jun/07

There is so much of inspiration in the words of the bible as in other scriptures and works of literature. But why do missionaries propound the fallacy that Jesus alone is the saviour?

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Bal's to ban Orkut

Bal's to ban Orkut
Oh, c'mon -- this is real foolish. Of all the issues our nation has to deal with, banning a website? Er -- hello -- where are the priorities? Are the Sena blind? Don't they see the pro-India communities on orkut at all?Incidentally, who are these folks to ban Orkut in India -- or for that matter, any site at all? Are these the custodians of our cyberspace? Why not just snub this?And, hey, does this mean that in this cover-up of freedom to express, no one can speak against a force like the Sena? Besides, does it really matter? To each their own, after all, and what *really* matters is how issues are dealt with on the soil, rather than in virtual orkutville. And will the mere banning of a website ensure the death of the anti-Seniate waves across India? Sh-ure it will. Like di Caprio suggests in The Departed -- 'these are questions, you know', and the Sena ought to ask themselves a few. Oops -- and here goes my iLand space. Banned. 'Coz I spoke out loud against them.Democracy, this. Yeah, rrright. And we shall vote.
Venu Gopal said...
3:09 PM 12/Jun/07
Absolute freedom (to do anything we want) would be available only in our minds. Once we step out into the world at large, we have to ensure that we do not trespass others'' freedom. This, of course, would ever be a tricky situation - for one man''s meat is another''s poison. However, now that the Internet has come along, I think it is vital that we leave this never-before kind of space absolutely free for all and any expression without any restriction whatsoever. The internet must be safeguarded as the most sacrosanct space for free speech available to man. It is our best bet to launch war against all fascist tendencies. Therefore, though we may disagree with what is in the net, we must defend with all our might the net''s freedom – never mind the Shiv Sainiks.

Thursday, June 7, 2007

The 'Nothing-to-do' man.

The ‘Nothing-to-do’ man.
[Many years ago, my friend in a foreign country had to leave his job. On that occasion, he had written an open letter to all his colleagues and friends. I revisited his letter after many years and have his permission to share it with the bloggers at Rediffmail. I may add that it has been over a decade since he left his job and he has very much kept his word. He has not been doing much since, not because he retired with a pile of money, but because he has become free from the trap of doing.]
After a 13½ years long association with . . ., I will be leaving on . . . Working with . . . has been a unique experience. The friendly, informal and down-to-earth interactions with various people have been a source of joy for me throughout my association with the company. It is a culture that I shall cherish wherever I go. You might be perhaps curious to know as to what I shall do henceforth. Frankly speaking, I will be on a pursuit to drop all pursuits. I have always been asking myself: Why am I doing what I am doing? What is it that I really want? And what is that which is going to eliminate all wants and urges and bring in a state of full contentment and completeness?. This has brought in a process of unwinding in my life and now I remain fully convinced that for fullness - the final home-coming - I have absolutely nothing to do, nothing to know and nothing to seek, as all pursuits are controlled by mental connections, caused by delusion. As Tao says: Sitting silently, the grass grows by itself, the sun shines by itself, the rain falls by itself and the river flows by itself. The entire realm of knowledge is summed up with a simple comment: Do not push the river.This understanding has emboldened me to live my future life without any ambitions, without any plans, without any schemes and without any fixations - moment to moment in a state of let-go. Thus, being a “mainstream drop-out”, my life is going to be a journey along a different path, or a pathless path.My address in India will be . . .If you happen to visit India any time, you are welcome to come and spend a few days with me and have exposure to a different lifestyle. Although I may not be able to offer you the comforts that are available here, I can give you one guarantee – what I have you too will have.

AttiDude said...
9:11 PM 7/Jun/07
how does he sustain his daily life?? but its amazing that someone cud actually do it...great!
Dear AttiDude, He is indeed an amazing guy. Keeping body and soul together is not a monetary problem for him. But then minimal expense is not a problem for a large number of us. The question is, what do we do after we have fed ourselves? Do we have any other hungers? If we have, then mark it - they are all hungers of the mind and not the poor body. Even the body needs so little if we go by the stomach. It is the tongue that makes us want much more. And so on and so forth.

Sandil Srinivasan said...
8:59 PM 7/Jun/07
:-) What finally happened?
Dear Sandil,

Finally, he lived happily ever after. Dear Sandil, this person is the genuine one. He stays in Pune. His phone number is 952065208490. I call him from Mumbai. Therefore you may have to change the initial numbers if you are calling from a different town or maybe you don't have to because the phone, I think, is a mobile. Anyway, do try to speak him. You'll find him refreshing.

Abhishek Shandilya said...
7:51 PM 7/Jun/07
What happened to him then? I want to meet him.
Dear Abhyishek,

You are in luck. The “Nothing to do” man stays in Pune. I understand you also live in Pune. I call him on 952065208490 from Mumbai. You could probably drop the first few digits if you are calling from Pune. Do call him and strive to meet him.

Tuesday, June 5, 2007

World Environment Day

hindutva.rediffiland.com/
Wednesday 6 June, 2007

By hindu icon 18:35 5/Jun/2007 0 Comment(s)
Add hindu icon as Friend Write to hindu icon Forward this link
WORLD ENVIORMENT DAY
WISHING U ALL WORLD ENVIORMENT DAY.a day to look back and see wat we hav done to mother earth.let us all just go back to our birth and visualise the earth we inherited from our forefathers and look at wat we r handing over to our wards.the kind of destruction wrought on earth by us should put us to shame.we r heading the dinosour way i.e to our extinction.we all as children of MAA BHARATI hav the responsibilty of bringing back semblance of equilibrium by applying the principles of VEDAS in our life and by that prompting the world to act.VANDE MATRAM.
Venu Gopal said...
9:23 AM 6/Jun/07

The Vedas talk about being in harmony with nature while the Semitic religions talk about exploiting nature. Am I correct or fair in making such a sweeping statement?

Friday, June 1, 2007

Beirut and the big-daddy


itsandil.rediffiland.com/
Saturday 2 June, 2007

By Sandil Srinivasan 01:16 2/Jun/2007 0 Comment(s)
Add Sandil Srinivasan as Friend Write to Sandil Srinivasan Forward this link
Beirut and the big-daddy
While YouTubin', I came across this message of peace, from a band I love, and for a conflict I've followed from birth. The preface, for those who know little about this blogger, is that I was born and lived all my life in Dubai, before finally connecting to the roots effectively, and relocating back to India in August 2006. Since then, there's been little media coverage (in my backyard, atleast) of the Arab conflict -- and understandably, as our nation has its own set of issues to deal with. And while I focused on understanding issues local to me, from the OBC reservations to stray dogs in Bangalore, Beirut went entirely off my radar. That, until my uncle (who's a Lebanese) arrived in Bangalore this April, for a thirty-day vacation. They may come across as the not-so-intelligent, violent lot, and that's very ironic, because Arabs are generally peace-loving and God-fearing.I can go on and on about the conflict there, from the Palestine uprising, to targeted attacks by (and on) Israel, to Iran funding Hezbollah, to the Syrian presence in Lebanon -- sigh. Rather, you'd wiki/google it all. But what I'd definitely get into, is the occidentalism, the ideas that persist around the Arab world, and a lot of that has rubbed off. Where, for Pete's sake, is the oh-so-concerned-about-the-rest-of-the-world America? Where are the peace-keeping forces? Why doesn't that region get enough humanitarian support, funding, infrastructure? The UAE Red Crescent have been doing a good job, almost from day one of the conflict, but it requires international reaction, recognition, awareness and support. Especially from the US of A.Wait, maybe I'm being unfair to the continent. I retract my statement -- so, where the freakin' hell is the United States of -- er -- Bush. And oops, there's the conflict of interest. It's no secret, that the USA and Israel are quite 'friendly', to say the least. This whole ball-talk of the 'war on terrorism', anti-terrorism units, retaining peace -- sigh, that's one helluva cover-up. The ground reality, if one's willing to investigate and find out, is harsh. Very harsh. The difference this time around, is that the 'custodians of peace' inflict terrorism on 'lesser-beings', through war and rampage.And in this whole militarysexual harrasment of Lebanon, the quiet, inactive United Nations serve as silent brokers to the whole setup. They facilitate, they support, but with a touch of diplomacy.On the streets, we call them pimps.My uncle, who's a Maronite Catholic, and has obvious apprehension towards the military-might of Hezbollah, always spoke against that unit, that 'bunch of radical Shiites'. Today, he hangs his head in shame, and sadly admits that his nation is now being protected by the Hezbollah. Hence -- he's forced to support the 'militant outfit'. Militant-shiliant. Hezbollah, for the record, run a political party, an official television broadcast channel, and an unofficial radio service in Lebanon. After dragging all that material above, here's my point: we (India) need to be more selective in who we pick as allies -- ethically, environmentally, politically, and from a military standpoint. We need to strike a decent balance between how much we allow other (less-ethical?) nations to dictate, control and contribute to our growth and expansion. And, for a country with relatively lesser religious-conflict these days in the context of our population, perhaps we have a lesson or two to teach, or a message of peace that can reach out. Until then, I'll leave you folks with this open thread on whether you think that having Bush as our big-daddy is healthy for our people, or not. Maybe our leaders should stop sucking up to him.And for those retarded folk who do love the 21st century's American-flavoured Hitler, hate-mail is welcome.
Permalink
Venu Gopal said...
10:50 AM 2/Jun/07

Arabs are no less than others are when it comes to greatness. Lebanese are particularly brilliant. They are a very colourful people. Such a beautiful country and with many vigorous and cultured communities. Alas, the balance tilted in Lebanon when Muslims took to Islamic fanaticism in the 70s and their fratricidal war with the Lebanese Christians ensued, reducing large parts of Beirut, particularly, to rubble. Even here, it was not a direct Muslim-Christian war. There was much aligning and de-aligning amongst disparate forces. All wars or battles are brutal and inhuman, but the Lebanese, being what they are, infused much romanticism about the whole affair. Finally, it was the Druze, who though counted as Muslims, but is decidedly of different orientation, who brought the war to a decisive end. (Please correct me if I am wrong.)

Venu Gopal said...
10:27 AM 2/Jun/07

While India should have close relations with the Arabs (which it already has, particularly to appease the Muslims at home), if we had aligned with Israelis from the beginning, they would have helped us in our agricultural endeavors and we might not be having farmer suicides today. Israel could also have been our major military supplier. But we chose to recognize Israel only when even the Arabs began to do so. This is a result of Indian polity being not genuinely secular but only pseudo-secular. Today, America can offer us far more economically than other countries. Moreover, we are both democratic countries, which cannot be said of the Arab block. Therefore, we must pursue closer relationship with America and be wary of undemocratic (or partially democratic) religious regimes like Iran.

slipperyways nMe said...
10:40 AM 2/Jun/07
bush or mush...... no better....but this is american policy. if bush had not been there, would have been someone else......even if Bush goes, the next president will be same...US will continue to dictate the world through its policies...which does not show any sign of change...till now....